• Photo
A newly-commissioned portrait of Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, by artist Paul Emsley hangs at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Friday, Jan. 11,

A newly-commissioned portrait of Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, by artist Paul Emsley hangs at the National Portrait Gallery in London, Friday, Jan. 11, 2013. (AP Photo/Sang Tan)

  • More Featured Content
Photos: DIY backyard lighting projects
Photos: DIY backyard lighting projects

It's all about atmosphere, so light up that backyard gathering …

Hurricane forecast: Another busy Atlantic season
NOAA: Another busy hurricane season

Thursday's outlook calls for 13 to 20 named storms, 7 to 11 …

Red Carpet Style | Fast and Furious 6
Red Carpet Style | Fast and Furious 6

See the stars of the blockbuster franchise on the red carpet.

Thunderstorms slow Oklahoma tornado cleanup
Storms slow Oklahoma tornado cleanup

A band of thunderstorms battered the Oklahoma City area …

Vote on gay Scouts comes at emotional moment
Boy Scouts vote on admitting gays

The Boy Scouts of America's national leadership will vote …

Advertisement

Critics divided over Duchess of Cambridge portrait

'I'm really sad to say this is a rotten portrait'

Updated: Friday, 11 Jan 2013, 2:18 PM EST
Published : Friday, 11 Jan 2013, 11:57 AM EST

LONDON (AP) — The Duchess of Cambridge seems to like her first official portrait, which is lucky for the artist. Many critics don't.

Paul Emsley's portrait of the former Kate Middleton shows the 31-year-old royal against a dark background, her lips pursed into a wry smile, with an ethereal light against her face and hair. Her pale complexion brings out the fine lines under the eyes, and the light adds a hint of silver to her rich brown hair.

Shortly after the portrait was unveiled Friday at the National Portrait Gallery in London, critics began grousing.

"It's a great, great opportunity missed," British Art Journal editor Robin Simon said. "The best thing you can say about it is that she doesn't actually look like that."

In a telephone interview, Simon said that Kate's nose was too large and that the painting drained the duchess of her sparkle.

Kate "transmits a sense of joie-de-vivre," he said. "This is dead, dead, dead."

Guardian arts writer Charlotte Higgins picked up on that theme, saying the portrait had a "sepulchral gloom" about it.

"Kate Middleton is — whatever you think of the monarchy and all its inane surrounding pomp — a pretty young woman with an infectious smile, a cascade of chestnut hair and a healthy bloom," she wrote in a post to her newspaper's website. "So how is it that she has been transformed into something unpleasant from the 'Twilight' franchise?"

Emsley told reporters at the opening that it was always going to be tough painting Kate, who sat for the portrait last year, before she became pregnant.

"A person whose image is so pervasive, for an artist it is really difficult to go beyond that and find something which is original," he said. "You have to rely on your technique and your artistic instincts to do that and I hope I've succeeded."

Royal portraits tend to veer between the staid and the controversial. Lucian Freud's 2001 portrait of Queen Elizabeth II remains a particularly notorious example, with some describing the heavy, severe painting of the monarch as deeply unflattering and others calling it groundbreaking.

In fairness to Emsley, some artists had praise for his work.

"I liked it, very much so," said Richard Stone, who has frequently painted members of the royal family. "So often with official portraits they can be rather stiff and starchy, but this has a lovely informality about it, and a warmth to it."

In any case, Emsley appeared to have won over his most important audience. Kate, who was with her husband, Prince William, a

  • Comment Privately

Comment to 24 Hour News 8

Don't have a Facebook account? Or don't want to share something publicly? Email us here.

Report a comment

See a comment that should be moderated? Fill out the form here and tell us why.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement