• Photo
Jeremy Hoven_20110919182241_JPG

Walgreens pharmacist Jeremy Hoven, seen in this surveillance photo, fired his weapon at a would-be robber on May 8, 2011. He was fired by the company. (Sept. 7, 2011)

  • Latest News
Ind. car thief breaks into Mich. homes
Ind. car thief breaks into Mich. homes

An Indiana man was arrested for allegedly stealing a vehicle in…

Fisherman drowns in Montcalm Co. lake
Fisherman drowns in Montcalm Co. lake

A fisherman accidentally drowned near his boat on a lake in …

2 accused of breaking into vehicles
2 accused of breaking into vehicles

Two people are accused of stealing items from some vehicles in …

2 hurt from cleaning agent at Amway
2 hurt from cleaning agent at Amway

Two Amway employees were hospitalized after coming into contact…

1 shot in pelvis area on GR SE side
1 shot in pelvis area on GR SE side

Grand Rapids police taped of a large area Wednesday night after…

Advertisement

Judge: Firing of armed pharmacist OK

Jeremy Hoven shot at armed robbers in May 2011

Updated: Thursday, 06 Dec 2012, 3:06 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 06 Dec 2012, 3:06 PM EST

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) - A federal judge has ruled in favor of Walgreens after a former employee sued, saying he was terminated for shooting at armed robbers in a Berrien County store.

Pharmacist Jeremy Hoven opened fire on armed robbery suspects at the Benton Township Walgreens in the early morning hours of May 8, 2011. No one was shot in the incident. But Walgreens fired Hoven, he said, for violating a non-escalation policy that he says he has never seen.

Hoven filed suit against Walgreens in September 2011, challenging the drug store chain's right to fire him for acting in self-defense. In a reply to the lawsuit at the time, Walgreens contended it had a plausible and legitimate business reason to justify its decision. The company said Hoven had no right to carry or discharge a weapon in their store at any time.

Tuesday, a federal judge determined that Hoven's right to self-defense did not trump Walgreens' right to fire Hoven for violating company policy.

The written ruling from US District Court Judge Janet Neff said that Hoven's case "fails to state a plausible public-policy wrongful discharge claim."

  • Comment Privately

Comment to 24 Hour News 8

Don't have a Facebook account? Or don't want to share something publicly? Email us here.

Report a comment

See a comment that should be moderated? Fill out the form here and tell us why.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement