• Gun Lake Casino - related stories
Gun Lake Casino shares $8.6m in revenue
Gun Lake Casino shares $8.6m in revenue

The Gun Lake Casino has announced it gave a little more than …

Gun Lake Casino donates to 13 libraries
Gun Lake Casino donates to 13 libraries

Gun Lake Casino, through its Charitable Giving Program, donated…

Jackpot: Gun Lake pays revenue sharing
Jackpot: Gun Lake pays revenue sharing

Officials with the Gun Lake casino presented a revenue-sharing …

US Sup Ct hears Gun Lake casino case
US Sup Ct hears Gun Lake casino case

Several Supreme Court justices seems troubled Tuesday at the …

Gun Lake Casino celebrates Year One
Gun Lake Casino celebrates Year One

It was years in the making and often at the center of intense …

SupCt to look at Gun Lake Casino case
SupCt to look at Gun Lake Casino case

The Supreme Court will decide whether a lawsuit attempting to …

Gun Lake Casino shares revenue
Gun Lake Casino shares revenue

Gun Lake Casino and Gun Lake Tribe of Pottawatomi Indians …

Advertisement

Gun Lake Casino foe wins lawsuit appeal

David Patchak can challenge land placement

Updated: Friday, 21 Jan 2011, 3:06 PM EST
Published : Friday, 21 Jan 2011, 2:14 PM EST

WAYLAND TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) - A federal appeals court on Friday revived a lawsuit challenging a new casino in southwestern Michigan on the same day that the American Indian tribe planned to announce the opening date for gambling.

Casino foe David Patchak of Wayland Township can challenge how the federal government placed the land in trust for the Gun Lake Tribe of Pottawatomi Indians, the court said.

"If the casino opens, it may not stay that way for very long," said Patchak's lawyer, John Bursch.

The tribe, known as the Gun Lake Band, does not plan to delay the afternoon announcement or the opening in Allegan County's Wayland Township, 20 miles south of Grand Rapids.

"The land is still in trust, and the casino will open ," spokesman James Nye said, noting the court did not rule on the merits of the lawsuit.

Patchak's lawyers have argued that the U.S. Interior Department did not have authority to put the land in trust, clearing the way for a casino, because the tribe was not federally recognized until after 1934. They believe their position is stronger after a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a similar case.

Before that decision, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., dismissed Patchak's lawsuit, saying he had no standing to sue. But the appeals court reversed that ruling and sent the case back for a fresh look.

"He alleged that the rural character of the area would be destroyed, that the value of his property would be diminished and that he would lose the enjoyment of the agricultural land surrounding the casino site," the appeals court said.

"It would be very strange to deny Patchak standing in this case," the three-judge panel said.

  • Comment Privately

Comment to 24 Hour News 8

Don't have a Facebook account? Or don't want to share something publicly? Email us here.

Report a comment

See a comment that should be moderated? Fill out the form here and tell us why.

Advertisement
Advertisement