• Decriminalization - related stories
GRPD begins enforcing new pot law
GRPD begins enforcing new pot law

Wednesday, police began issuing tickets for minor marijuana …

Decriminalization ruling expected soon
Decriminalization ruling expected soon

A Kent County judge is expected to deliver a written ruling …

GR asks for decriminalization ruling
GR asks for decriminalization ruling

The City of Grand Rapids argues it has a plan to allow people …

GR won't implement decriminalization
GR won't implement decriminalization

The City of Grand Rapids will not put an ordinance …

Order against GR pot amendment lifted
Order against GR pot amendment lifted

Kent County Circuit Court Judge Paul Sullivan issued a written …

GR decriminalization injunction upheld
GR decriminalization injunction upheld

The injunction that prevents Grand Rapids' marijuana …

Protestors to Forsyth: 'Respect vote'
Protestors to Forsyth: 'Respect vote'

About a hundred protestors spent more than an hour outside the …

Decriminalize pot debate at commission
Decriminalize pot debate at commission

The conflict over a charter amendment that decriminalized …

GR pot decriminalization challenged
GR pot decriminalization challenged

The Kent County prosecutor is suing the City of Grand Rapids, …

GR voters decriminalize marijuana
GR voters decriminalize marijuana

Getting caught with some marijuana in Grand Rapids is now a …

GR Proposal 2: Decriminalize pot
GR Proposal 2: Decriminalize pot

Not surprisingly, the backers of a plan to decriminalize …

Advertisement

GR decriminalization injunction upheld

Prosecutor challenged marijuana ordinance in Dec.

Updated: Wednesday, 09 Jan 2013, 6:24 PM EST
Published : Wednesday, 09 Jan 2013, 6:24 PM EST

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) - The injunction that prevents Grand Rapids' marijuana decriminalization ordinance from taking effect will remain in place as the Kent County Prosecutor challenges it.

In November, Grand Rapids citizens voted to decriminalize marijuana possession in the city.

But Kent County Prosecutor William Forsyth challenged the proposed change in December, saying that it is in conflict with state law and puts local officers in a difficult position. Implementation of the new ordinance was put on hold.

Wednesday, Judge Paul Sullivan heard oral arguments on the injunction itself -- or whether the ordinance should be put on hold while the case moves forward. The judge decided that until the issue is settled, the ordinance will not go into effect.

Sullivan is expected to issue a written decision on the injunction as early as Jan. 21.

  • Comment Privately

Comment to 24 Hour News 8

Don't have a Facebook account? Or don't want to share something publicly? Email us here.

Report a comment

See a comment that should be moderated? Fill out the form here and tell us why.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement