(L-R seated )Anthony M. Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. (L-R standing) Samuel Alito Jr., Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
(L-R seated )Anthony M. Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. (L-R standing) Samuel Alito Jr., Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Updated: Wednesday, 30 Sep 2009, 1:11 PM EDT
Published : Wednesday, 30 Sep 2009, 12:31 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court will decide whether a man's murder conviction
should have been thrown out because there were too few African
Americans in a county's jury pool in Michigan.
State officials are asking the high court to overturn a
decision by the 6th U.S. Court of Appeals in Cincinnati.
That court threw out the murder conviction of Diapolis Smith
for shooting a man in Grand Rapids in 1991.
Smith, who is black, was found guilty by an all-white jury.
He said his constitutional right to a jury that represents the
community was violated because there were only three blacks in the
pool of 60 to 100 prospective jurors.
He argued that Kent County's prospective jurors in 1993 were
routinely excused because of child care, a lack of transportation
or a conflict with work. Smith also said blacks in Grand Rapids
were being diverted to jury duty in a city court, which took them
off the rolls for a year.
Blacks in the city made up 85 percent of all blacks in the
county.
The appeals court said those decisions resulted in fewer
African-Americans being eligible for service on circuit court
juries, calling it "systematic exclusion."
The case is Berghuis v. Smith, 08-1402.